lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180207111016.st365i56w67gmjbj@node.shutemov.name>
Date:   Wed, 7 Feb 2018 14:10:16 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/tme: Detect if TME and MKTME is activated by BIOS

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:00:44AM +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
> > Suggestions?
> 
> I would go with 'tme_cryto_alg', and 'mktme_supported_crypto_algs' for
> the two variables, and TME_CRYPTO_ALG(x), TME_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS_128, 
> MKTME_SUPPORTED_CRYPTO_ALGS(x), and MKTME_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS_128 for
> the macros, but it's up to you and other guys.

I'll leave it as is for now.

> Btw I do think AES_XTS should be AES_XTS_128, even you go with current
> names, as AES cipher can also take 256-bit key.

Good point.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ