[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518005275.3677.112.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:07:55 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 11:07 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> This is really unfortunate naming of kernel option.
>
> spectre_v2=off sounds like we are turning the "bug" off, but i somehow
> suspect you are turning the bug _workaround_ off.
That's consistent with what we have on x86.
> > +ifdef CONFIG_EXPOLINE
> > + ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn,$(CC_FLAGS_MARCH) -mindirect-branch=thunk),y)
> > + CC_FLAGS_EXPOLINE := -mindirect-branch=thunk
> > + CC_FLAGS_EXPOLINE += -mfunction-return=thunk
> > + CC_FLAGS_EXPOLINE += -mindirect-branch-table
> > + export CC_FLAGS_EXPOLINE
> > + cflags-y += $(CC_FLAGS_EXPOLINE)
> > + else
> > + $(warning "Your gcc lacks the -mindirect-branch= option")
> > + endif
> > +endif
That isn't, though. Linus asked us to drop the $(warning) part.
... and then spent a week building with a non-retpoline compiler and
not noticing, so he might have changed his mind ;)
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists