linux-kernel - 来自liuxiang的邮件

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Feb 2018 20:10:03 +0800 (CST)
From:   liuxiang <liuxiang_1999@....com>
To:     pali.rohar@...il.com, afd@...com, sre@...nel.org,
        liu.xiang6@....com.cn, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 来自liuxiang的邮件

Sorry, I can't test these pieces of code now.

On Saturday 27 January 2018 22:25:36 Liu Xiang wrote:
> According to the datasheet, bq27411 is similar to bq27421.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang6@....com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h  |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> index 51f0961..2de378a 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ enum bq27xxx_reg_index {
>  #define bq27425_regs bq27421_regs
>  #define bq27441_regs bq27421_regs
>  #define bq27621_regs bq27421_regs
> +#define bq27411_regs bq27421_regs
>  
>  static enum power_supply_property bq27000_props[] = {
>  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> @@ -633,6 +634,7 @@ enum bq27xxx_reg_index {
>  #define bq27425_props bq27421_props
>  #define bq27441_props bq27421_props
>  #define bq27621_props bq27421_props
> +#define bq27411_props bq27421_props
>  
>  struct bq27xxx_dm_reg {
>  	u8 subclass_id;
> @@ -716,6 +718,17 @@ enum bq27xxx_dm_reg_id {
>  #define bq27621_dm_regs 0
>  #endif
>  
> +#if 0 /* not yet tested */
> +static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27411_dm_regs[] = {
> +	[BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY]   = { 82, 10, 2,    0, 32767 },
> +	[BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY]     = { 82, 12, 2,    0, 32767 },
> +	[BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = { 82, 16, 2, 2800,  3700 },
> +};
> +#else
> +#define bq27411_dm_regs 0
> +#endif

Can you test it?

I do not think it is a good idea to add dead code into mainline kernel.

> +
> +
>  #define BQ27XXX_O_ZERO	0x00000001
>  #define BQ27XXX_O_OTDC	0x00000002
>  #define BQ27XXX_O_UTOT  0x00000004
> @@ -762,6 +775,7 @@ enum bq27xxx_dm_reg_id {
>  	[BQ27425]   = BQ27XXX_DATA(bq27425,   0x04143672, BQ27XXX_O_UTOT | BQ27XXX_O_CFGUP),
>  	[BQ27441]   = BQ27XXX_DATA(bq27441,   0x80008000, BQ27XXX_O_UTOT | BQ27XXX_O_CFGUP | BQ27XXX_O_RAM),
>  	[BQ27621]   = BQ27XXX_DATA(bq27621,   0x80008000, BQ27XXX_O_UTOT | BQ27XXX_O_CFGUP | BQ27XXX_O_RAM),
> +	[BQ27411]   = BQ27XXX_DATA(bq27411,   0x80008000, BQ27XXX_O_UTOT | BQ27XXX_O_CFGUP | BQ27XXX_O_RAM),
>  };
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(bq27xxx_list_lock);
> diff --git a/include/linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h b/include/linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h
> index e6187f5..5f48eb0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h
> +++ b/include/linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h
> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ enum bq27xxx_chip {
>  	BQ27546,
>  	BQ27742,
>  	BQ27545, /* bq27545 */
> -	BQ27421, /* bq27421, bq27425, bq27441, bq27621 */
> +	BQ27421, /* bq27421, bq27425, bq27441, bq27621, bq27411 */
>  	BQ27425,
>  	BQ27441,
>  	BQ27621,
> +	BQ27411,
>  };
>  
>  struct bq27xxx_device_info;