[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d143fabe24f43de933dc60ce6480d00@ausx13mpc120.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 13:08:08 +0000
From: <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
To: <pali.rohar@...il.com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
<dvhart@...radead.org>, <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
<acelan.kao@...onical.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI
driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@...il.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 3:55 AM
> To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>; Limonciello, Mario
> <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>; andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com;
> dvhart@...radead.org; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org;
> acelan.kao@...onical.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI driver
>
> On Wednesday 07 February 2018 10:47:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > BTW, please CC patches with ACPI material to linux-acpi. They are less likely
> > to be overlooked by me then and the others on that list may have opinions on
> > them too.
>
> Maybe we can update MAINTAINERS file for acpi based platform-x86 drivers
> to include linux-acpi list? Darren, Andy, any idea?
>
I would also wonder if the intel-vbtn driver should still live in platform-x86 as it's
now pure ACPI driver with this change Andy proposed.
Btw Andy for your v2 with your fixups that were in your review branch feel free
to add:
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
When you resubmit it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists