linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 30/41] ARM: davinci: switch to common clock framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4268330e-25a7-e11d-7863-6a6004419b07@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:50:59 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 30/41] ARM: davinci: switch to common clock framework

On Saturday 20 January 2018 10:44 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> This switches ARCH_DAVINCI to use the common clock framework. The legacy
> clock code in arch/arm/mach-davinci/ is no longer used. New drivers in
> drivers/clk/davinci/ are used instead.
> 
> A few macros had to be moved to prevent compile errors.

s/compile/compilation

> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>

> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
>  #include <media/davinci/vpbe.h>
>  #include <media/davinci/vpbe_osd.h>
>  
> +#define DAVINCI_PLL1_BASE		0x01c40800
> +#define DAVINCI_PLL2_BASE		0x01c40c00
> +#define	DAVINCI_PWR_SLEEP_CNTRL_BASE	0x01c41000

Please drop the tab after #define

With that.

Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>

Thanks,
Sekhar