lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:49:40 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] x86: Enumerate TME and PCONFIG, add MKTME_KEY_PROG
 helper

On 02/07/2018 04:59 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> The patchset does some ground work for MKTME enabling:
>   - Adds two new cpufeatures: TME and PCONFIG;
>   - Detects if BIOS enabled TME and MKTME;
>   - Enumerates what PCONFIG targets are supported;
>   - Provides helper to program encryption keys into CPU;
> 
> As part of TME enumeration we check of how many bits from physical address
> are claimed for encryption key ID. This may be critical as we or guest VM
> must not use these bits for physical address.

For this kind of stuff, I'd really appreciate if you included some
high-level descriptions.  I'd assume that a reviewer has no idea what
PCONFIG or MKTME is.

It would also be really nice to say which hardware will implement this.
Is it in particular CPUs today, for instance?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ