[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83ddad10-936f-9848-e3d1-8c6e73ab2969@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:43:33 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] x86: Patchable constants
FYI: the interface I'm implementing looks like this:
[output =] const_op(data, variable);
... where variable can be any variable with a static address, although
in any sane scenario it should be __ro_after_init. During
initialization, it kicks out to an out-of-line (.alternatives_aux)
handler which accesses the variable in normal fashion, but at
alternatives-patching time it inlines the relevant opcodes.
Some of the assembly infrastructure for this is indeed hairy, especially
when the out-of-line hander needs temp registers.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists