[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6516358.IX2q0Oe07P@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 23:33:55 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"Mario.Limonciello@...l.com" <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"acelan.kao@...onical.com" <acelan.kao@...onical.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI driver
On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 10:55:22 AM CET Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 February 2018 10:47:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > BTW, please CC patches with ACPI material to linux-acpi. They are less likely
> > to be overlooked by me then and the others on that list may have opinions on
> > them too.
>
> Maybe we can update MAINTAINERS file for acpi based platform-x86 drivers
> to include linux-acpi list? Darren, Andy, any idea?
You could, but generally, if you have ACPI material in your patch,
CCing linux-acpi won't hurt.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists