linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] GHES: add a notify chain for process memory section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a26d3082-ef72-9684-5f22-4d65b8adb998@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 16:41:23 +0800
From:   Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC:     <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, <james.morse@....com>,
        <Dave.Martin@....com>, <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
        <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>, <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
        <julien.thierry@....com>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
        <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>, <zhengqiang10@...wei.com>,
        <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>, <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
        <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <lijinyue@...wei.com>,
        <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] GHES: add a notify chain for process memory
 section

Hi Boris,

Thanks for your comments.

On 2018/2/7 18:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 08:31:24PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
>> Add a notify chain for process memory section, with
>> which other modules might do error recovery.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
>> Tested-by: Wang Xiongfeng <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
>> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>  include/acpi/ghes.h      |  8 ++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index cff671d..1f0ebfb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes)
>>  static LIST_HEAD(ghes_hed);
>>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(ghes_list_mutex);
>>  
>> +ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(ghes_mem_err_chain);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ghes_mem_err_chain);
> 
> Definitely not EXPORT_SYMBOL.
> 
> And certainly not export the notifier head. Have register and unregister
> functions instead.
> 
> That is, *if* you can't solve it differently with James. Notifiers
> should be avoided if possible.
> 

Yes, I saw the patchset, I agree. I will work with James to solve the problem.

-- 
Thanks,
Xie XiuQi