linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] irqchip/gic-v3-its: add ability to resend MAPC on resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGAzgsprocoZRtccPrbArUqyBTYiQm=vr6qjrK-5rAMSeusZ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Feb 2018 16:00:53 -0800
From:   "dbasehore ." <dbasehore@...omium.org>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Soby Mathew <Soby.Mathew@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] irqchip/gic-v3-its: add ability to resend MAPC on resume

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I'm really not an expert on this, so take my observations with a large
> grain of salt:
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:46:42AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 07/02/18 01:41, Derek Basehore wrote:
>> > This adds functionality to resend the MAPC command to an ITS node on
>> > resume. If the ITS is powered down during suspend and the collections
>> > are not backed by memory, the ITS will lose that state. This just sets
>> > up the known state for the collections after the ITS is restored.
>> >
>> > This is enabled via the reset-on-suspend flag in the DTS for an ITS
>> > that has a non-zero number of collections stored in it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c   | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> >  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h |  1 +
>> >  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> > index 5e63635e2a7b..dd6cd6e68ed0 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> > @@ -1942,52 +1942,53 @@ static void its_cpu_init_lpis(void)
>> >     dsb(sy);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -static void its_cpu_init_collection(void)
>> > +static void its_cpu_init_collection(struct its_node *its)
>
> ...
>
>> > @@ -3127,6 +3128,9 @@ static void its_restore_enable(void)
>> >                     its_write_baser(its, baser, baser->val);
>> >             }
>> >             writel_relaxed(its->ctlr_save, base + GITS_CTLR);
>> > +
>> > +           if (GITS_TYPER_HWCOLLCNT(gic_read_typer(base + GITS_TYPER)) > 0)
>> > +                   its_cpu_init_collection(its);
>>
>> This isn't correct. Think of a system where half the collections are in
>> HW, and the other half memory based (nothing in the spec forbids this).
>> You must evaluate the CID of each collection and replay the MAPC *only*
>> if it falls into the range [0..HCC-1]. The memory-based collections are
>> already mapped, and remapping an already mapped collection requires
>> extra care (see MAPC and the UNPREDICTABLE behaviour when V=1), so don't
>> go there.
>
> IIUC, this is only run on CPU0 (it's in syscore resume), so implicitly,
> CID is 0. Thus, the current condition is already doing what you ask:
>
>         HCC > 0 == CID
>
> which is equivalent to:
>
>         HCC - 1 >= CID
>
> Or should we really double check what CPU we're running on?

There seems to be the edge case where you hotplug CPU 0 before
suspending. In that case, I believe you're on the lowest number CPU
left?

It seems that all of the CPUs that are disabled have the ITS
reinitialized from scratch via enable_nonboot_cpus(). This code runs
on only the CPU that firmware resumes with. If that CPU isn't CPU 0
for whatever reason, we need to make sure that it's processor ID is
less than HCC.

>
> Brian