[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180208101348.GF25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:13:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] BUILD REGRESSION
a2e5790d841658485d642196dbb0927303d6c22f
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:47:53AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra
> > I went through the register opcodes and matched it against the ModR/M
> > encoding, and the best option I've found so far is using 0xd6 as the
> > next byte.
>
> Wouldn't 0xc3 work as well.
> A retq is probably better than an extra (bad).
I explicity did not use c3 because that generates spurious "retq" in the
code flow which is mighty confusing when you read the stuff.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists