[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180208134828.hkrslcoa5xzznkj3@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 15:48:28 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@...il.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Grzegorz Andrejczuk <grzegorz.andrejczuk@...el.com>,
Haim Cohen <haim.cohen@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <Kan.liang@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)"
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@...el.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Intel SGX Driver
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:46:53AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2018-01-09 16:27:30, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:17:24PM +0100, Cedric Blancher wrote:
> > > So how does this protect against the MELTDOWN attack (CVE-2017-5754)
> > > and the MELTATOMBOMBA4 worm which uses this exploit?
> > >
> > > Ced
> >
> > Everything going out of L1 gets encrypted. This is done to defend
> > against peripheral like adversaries and should work also against
> > meltdown.
>
> Yeah, but useless against spectre and ability to introduce bit flips
> means this is generally useless...
You are right.
And what I said was simply false. In fact, the encryption is done in
LCC. I'm sorry that I didn't response to my response and gave incorrect
info. I simply forgot to do this, no other excuses.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists