lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180208144918.GF10945@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 06:49:18 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+283c3c447181741aea28@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
        jlayton@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mingo@...nel.org,
        rgoldwyn@...e.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in sync_blockdev

> > It seems multiple processes deadlocked on the bd_mutex. 
> > Unfortunately there's no backtrace for the lock acquisitions,
> > so it's hard to see the exact sequence.
> 
> Well, all in the report points to a situation where some IO was submitted
> to the block device and never completed (more exactly it took longer than
> those 120s to complete that IO). It would need more digging into the

Are you sure? I didn't think outstanding IO would take bd_mutex.

-Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ