[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180208152730.GA4906@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 08:27:30 -0700
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...com,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, joshi.k@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: optimization for classic polling
On Sun, May 30, 2083 at 09:51:06AM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> This removes the dependency on interrupts to wake up task. Set task
> state as TASK_RUNNING, if need_resched() returns true,
> while polling for IO completion.
> Earlier, polling task used to sleep, relying on interrupt to wake it up.
> This made some IO take very long when interrupt-coalescing is enabled in
> NVMe.
>
> Reference:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2018-February/015435.html
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/block_dev.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> fs/direct-io.c | 8 ++++++--
> fs/iomap.c | 10 +++++++---
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
I think it'd be simpler to have blk_poll set it back to running if
need_resched is true rather than repeat this patter across all the
callers:
---
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index df93102e2149..40285fe1c8ad 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3164,6 +3164,7 @@ static bool __blk_mq_poll(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq)
cpu_relax();
}
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
return false;
}
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists