linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix CR4 after VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad78ef46-7471-c095-0dd9-a5d5fbe85698@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 17:40:37 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:     kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix CR4 after VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME failure

On 08/02/2018 16:54, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com> wrote:
>> Similarly, the correct L1 CR4 value should be in vmcs01's CR4
>> read shadow field.
> Sorry; that's wrong. L1's CR4 value has to be reconstructed from the
> vmcs01 guest CR4 field and CR4 shadow field using the cr4 guest/host
> mask. But there is no way to get it from any field(s) in vmcs12.

Now that we have the prepare_vmcs02_full/prepare_vmcs02 split, we
probably should do more checks in there, and not rely on the processor
anymore.

Paolo