[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180208023805.GE223@LTA0271908.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 20:38:05 -0600
From: Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>
To: Maxim Uvarov <muvarov@...il.com>
CC: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Tomas Paukrt <tomas.paukrt@...antech-bb.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] musb_host: fix lockup on rxcsr_h_error
Maxim,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:24:54PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Bin,
>
> I looked to my local git and code does not have this latest line "goto
> finish". It was tested without it and everything worked. Right now I
> can not get access to that hardware to check with and without. But
> only can confirm that without "goto finish" function works with bunch
> of drivers (usb ethernet, hids, hdd).
Thanks for the confirmation. The revert patch has been sent out.
Regards,
-Bin.
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim.
>
> 2018-01-25 19:31 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>:
> > Maxim,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 07:24:02PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> >> [1] says that issue is with back ported driver to 3.12.10. Can the
> >> latest kernel be tested on the same hw?
> >
> > Agreed that it should be tested with the latest kernel. But my concern
> > now is if stopping scheduling urbs on errors is a right thing to do,
> > that is why I asked if you can re-test your usecase with reverting the
> > commit. I am unable to reproduce the original issue you had.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Bin.
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim Uvarov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists