linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] BUILD REGRESSION a2e5790d841658485d642196dbb0927303d6c22f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFx7=cw0myoidwzhEfKd_L2Q6u0=AdcH_ZBmXu2_nD=4Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:15:30 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] BUILD REGRESSION a2e5790d841658485d642196dbb0927303d6c22f

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> But yes, for our purposes UD2 is perfectly fine too, it will just mess
> up the people doing bringup and the like.

Oh, we'll inconvenience people inside Intel?

The same people who changed and screwed up the definition of UD0 just
a couple of months ago?

I'm *so* sorry for the inconvenience to those people /s.

F*ck them. They introduced the problem, they get to live with it.

                 Linus