[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180208235615.GA28206@sejong>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 08:56:15 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] tracing: Add indexing of arguments for function
based events
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:43:43AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:59:24 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > @@ -347,6 +361,8 @@ static long long get_arg(struct func_arg *arg, unsigned long val)
> > > char buf[8];
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > + val += arg->index;
> > > +
> > > if (!arg->indirect)
> > > return val;
> >
> > So this also works without the indirect, and just add the immediate to
> > the value.
>
> Not sure what you are asking here. The immediate adds to the current
> value, where as the indirect will then look what's at that location.
I expected that the immediate offset is only meaningful with the
indirect (dereference) as the doc says just about it. So I asked it
was intentional or not.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists