lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5A7D4CE9.6070900@samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:25:29 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: exynos5433: Extend list of available AUD_PLL
 output frequencies

On 2018년 02월 07일 22:04, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 12:24 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Could you share your equation?
>> because your result is a little bit different of my result.
>> - my equation : ((mdiv + kdiv/65535) x 24MHz) / (pdiv x POWER(2,sdiv))
> 
> It resembles the code from samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate():
> 
> (24 * 10^6 * (M * 2^16 + K)) / (P * 2^S) / 2^16
> 
> and a more accurate one
> 
> ROUNDDOWN(ROUNDDOWN(24 * 10^6 * (M * 2^16 + K), 0) / ROUNDDOWN(P * 2^S, 0) / 2^16, 0)
> 
> Shouldn't you substitute 65535 with 65536?

65536 is right. It is my mistake using 65535.
Thanks for your share.

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ