[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180209081638.hcmruhckeu47kibx@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 11:16:38 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, gavin.dg@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: fix potential clearing to referenced flag in
page_idle_clear_pte_refs_one()
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 08:47:35PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 2/8/18 8:33 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 02:39:26PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:06:36 +0800 Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > For PTE-mapped THP, the compound THP has not been split to normal 4K
> > > > pages yet, the whole THP is considered referenced if any one of sub
> > > > page is referenced.
> > > >
> > > > When walking PTE-mapped THP by pvmw, all relevant PTEs will be checked
> > > > to retrieve referenced bit. But, the current code just returns the
> > > > result of the last PTE. If the last PTE has not referenced, the
> > > > referenced flag will be cleared.
> > > >
> > > > So, here just break pvmw walk once referenced PTE is found if the page
> > > > is a part of THP.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > --- a/mm/page_idle.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/page_idle.c
> > > > @@ -67,6 +67,14 @@ static bool page_idle_clear_pte_refs_one(struct page *page,
> > > > if (pvmw.pte) {
> > > > referenced = ptep_clear_young_notify(vma, addr,
> > > > pvmw.pte);
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * For PTE-mapped THP, one sub page is referenced,
> > > > + * the whole THP is referenced.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (referenced && PageTransCompound(pvmw.page)) {
> > > > + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > This means that the function will no longer clear the referenced bits
> > > in all the ptes. What effect does this have and should we document
> > > this in some fashion?
> > Yeah, the patch is wrong. We need to get all ptes for THP cleared.
> >
> > What about something like this instead (untested):
>
> Thanks, Kirill. It looks correct. All ptes should be cleared.
>
> I'm going to prepare v2 patch.
Note, it should be ||=, not |= (although it would work correctly too).
I should really wake up properly before touching code. :-/
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists