[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66016771.HTTzQvm2zL@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:56:50 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, khilman@...nel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep
On Friday, January 26, 2018 9:38:19 AM CET Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and
> genpd_dev_pm_attach() here,
> my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context,
> namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
> Thus mdelay can be replaced with msleep to avoid busy wait.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 0c80bea..f84ac72 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ static void genpd_dev_pm_detach(struct device *dev, bool power_off)
> if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> break;
>
> - mdelay(i);
> + msleep(i);
> cond_resched();
> }
>
> @@ -2231,7 +2231,7 @@ int genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev)
> if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> break;
>
> - mdelay(i);
> + msleep(i);
> cond_resched();
> }
> mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
>
Ulf, Kevin, any concerns or objections?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists