[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180209123446.GB485@tigerII.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 21:34:46 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] zsmalloc: introduce zs_huge_object() function
On (02/09/18 13:11), Mike Rapoport wrote:
[..]
> > +/**
> > + * zs_huge_object() - Test if a compressed object's size is too big for normal
> > + * zspool classes and it will be stored in a huge class.
>
> Maybe "it should be stored ..."?
Agreed.
> > + * @sz: Size in bytes of the compressed object.
> > + *
> > + * The functions checks if the object's size falls into huge_class area.
> > + * We must take ZS_HANDLE_SIZE into account and test the actual size we
>
> ^ %ZS_HANDLE_SIZE
Indeed. ``%CONST``
> > + * are going to use up, because zs_malloc() unconditionally adds the
>
> I think 's/use up/use/' here
Agreed.
> > + * handle size before it performs size_class lookup.
>
> ^ &size_class
OK. ``&struct name``
Thanks for reviewing it!
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists