[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e54c525-1b78-bef3-7f83-82eb872837da@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 18:14:49 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com>,
Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
John Keeping <john@...anate.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: endpoint: Handle 64-bit BARs properly
Hi Bjorn,
On Friday 09 February 2018 03:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:17:32PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 08 February 2018 06:03 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>>> A 64-bit BAR uses the succeeding BAR for the upper bits, therefore
>>> we cannot call pci_epc_set_bar() on a BAR that follows a 64-bit BAR.
>>>
>>> If pci_epc_set_bar() is called with flag PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64,
>>
>> Not related to $patch. But I have a query on when
>> PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 should be set. Whether if the size is >
>> 4G or if the address can be mapped anywhere in the 64-bit PCIe
>> address space or both?
>
> In general, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 should be set if the BAR is
> 64 bits wide. IORESOURCE_MEM_64 is similar.
okay, if the HW support 64bit BAR, 64 bit flag should be set and not based on
size or anything else?
Thanks
Kishon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists