[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180209073649.Horde.OueGLKMtzpLyz4w36quXUca@gator4166.hostgator.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:36:49 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/nldev: Fix multiple potential NULL pointer
dereferences
Hi Leon,
Quoting Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 12:37:02AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In case the message header and payload cannot be stored, function
>> nlmsg_put returns null.
>>
>> Fix this by adding multiple sanity checks and avoid a potential
>> null dereference on _nlh_ when calling nlmsg_end.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1454215 ("Dereference null return value")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1454223 ("Dereference null return value")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1454224 ("Dereference null return value")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464669 ("Dereference null return value")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464670 ("Dereference null return value")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464672 ("Dereference null return value")
>> Fixes: e5c9469efcb1 ("RDMA/netlink: Add nldev device doit implementation")
>> Fixes: c3f66f7b0052 ("RDMA/netlink: Implement nldev port doit callback")
>> Fixes: 7d02f605f0dc ("RDMA/netlink: Add nldev port dumpit implementation")
>> Fixes: b5fa635aab8f ("RDMA/nldev: Provide detailed QP information")
>> Fixes: bf3c5a93c523 ("RDMA/nldev: Provide global resource utilization")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>
> It will be much better to fix the tool instead of fixing ghost case.
> This scenario is impossible for all those flows.
> We can receive the skv/msg in two ways:
> * First by allocating new message with NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, which
> has more room
> than nlmsg_total_size(payload), payload is 0.
> * Second by getting from netlink.c and it will be at least "struct
> nlmsghdr" too.
>
> Can you please add this info to the commit message?
>
Actually, I was planing to send a new version of this patch. This time
using the unlikely macro for all the null checks on nlh.
What do you think?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists