[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180209140754.17062-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:07:51 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv3 2/5] x86/tme: Detect if TME and MKTME is activated by BIOS
IA32_TME_ACTIVATE MSR (0x982) can be used to check if BIOS has enabled
TME and MKTME. It includes which encryption policy/algorithm is selected
for TME or available for MKTME. For MKTME, the MSR also enumerates how
many KeyIDs are available.
We would need to exclude KeyID bits from physical address bits.
detect_tme() would adjust cpuinfo_x86::x86_phys_bits accordingly.
We have to do this even if we are not going to use KeyID bits
ourself. VM guests still have to know that these bits are not usable
for physical address.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 319bf989fad1..5aa51efc2ff2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -506,6 +506,93 @@ static void detect_vmx_virtcap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
}
}
+#define MSR_IA32_TME_ACTIVATE 0x982
+
+/* Helpers to access TME_ACTIVATE MSR */
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_LOCKED(x) (x & 0x1)
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_ENABLED(x) (x & 0x2)
+
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY(x) ((x >> 4) & 0xf) /* Bits 7:4 */
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY_AES_XTS_128 0
+
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_KEYID_BITS(x) ((x >> 32) & 0xf) /* Bits 35:32 */
+
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_ALGS(x) ((x >> 48) & 0xffff) /* Bits 63:48 */
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_AES_XTS_128 1
+
+/* Values for mktme_status (SW only construct) */
+#define MKTME_ENABLED 0
+#define MKTME_DISABLED 1
+#define MKTME_UNINITIALIZED 2
+static int mktme_status = MKTME_UNINITIALIZED;
+
+static void detect_tme(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ u64 tme_activate, tme_policy, tme_crypto_algs;
+ int keyid_bits = 0, nr_keyids = 0;
+ static u64 tme_activate_cpu0 = 0;
+
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_TME_ACTIVATE, tme_activate);
+
+ if (mktme_status != MKTME_UNINITIALIZED) {
+ if (tme_activate != tme_activate_cpu0) {
+ /* Broken BIOS? */
+ pr_err_once("x86/tme: configuation is inconsistent between CPUs\n");
+ pr_err_once("x86/tme: MKTME is not usable\n");
+ mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
+
+ /* Proceed. We may need to exclude bits from x86_phys_bits. */
+ }
+ } else {
+ tme_activate_cpu0 = tme_activate;
+ }
+
+ if (!TME_ACTIVATE_LOCKED(tme_activate) || !TME_ACTIVATE_ENABLED(tme_activate)) {
+ pr_info_once("x86/tme: not enabled by BIOS\n");
+ mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (mktme_status != MKTME_UNINITIALIZED)
+ goto detect_keyid_bits;
+
+ pr_info("x86/tme: enabled by BIOS\n");
+
+ tme_policy = TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY(tme_activate);
+ if (tme_policy != TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY_AES_XTS_128)
+ pr_warn("x86/tme: Unknown policy is active: %#llx\n", tme_policy);
+
+ tme_crypto_algs = TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_ALGS(tme_activate);
+ if (!(tme_crypto_algs & TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_AES_XTS_128)) {
+ pr_err("x86/mktme: No known encryption algorithm is supported: %#llx\n",
+ tme_crypto_algs);
+ mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
+ }
+detect_keyid_bits:
+ keyid_bits = TME_ACTIVATE_KEYID_BITS(tme_activate);
+ nr_keyids = (1UL << keyid_bits) - 1;
+ if (nr_keyids) {
+ pr_info_once("x86/mktme: enabled by BIOS\n");
+ pr_info_once("x86/mktme: %d KeyIDs available\n", nr_keyids);
+ } else {
+ pr_info_once("x86/mktme: disabled by BIOS\n");
+ }
+
+ if (mktme_status == MKTME_UNINITIALIZED) {
+ /* MKTME is usable */
+ mktme_status = MKTME_ENABLED;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Exclude KeyID bits from physical address bits.
+ *
+ * We have to do this even if we are not going to use KeyID bits
+ * ourself. VM guests still have to know that these bits are not usable
+ * for physical address.
+ */
+ c->x86_phys_bits -= keyid_bits;
+}
+
static void init_intel_energy_perf(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
u64 epb;
@@ -676,6 +763,9 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_VMX))
detect_vmx_virtcap(c);
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TME))
+ detect_tme(c);
+
init_intel_energy_perf(c);
init_intel_misc_features(c);
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists