[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1518186031-17997-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 06:20:26 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@...il.com, will.deacon@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 05/10] README: Fix a couple of punctuation errors
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
index 9a3bb5949191..dca7d823ad57 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ IRIW+mbonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
between each pairs of reads. In other words, is smp_mb()
sufficient to cause two different reading processes to agree on
the order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
- variable by a different process.
+ variable by a different process?
IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
Test of independent reads from independent writes with nothing
between each pairs of reads. In other words, is anything at all
needed to cause two different reading processes to agree on the
order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
- variable by a different process.
+ variable by a different process?
ISA2+poonceonces.litmus
As below, but with store-release replaced with WRITE_ONCE()
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists