[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180209175513.17100-25-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:54:54 +0000
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: dave.martin@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, jnair@...iumnetworks.com,
ckadabi@...eaurora.org, robin.murphy@....com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/21] arm64: capabilities: Restrict KPTI detection to boot-time CPUs
KPTI is treated as a system wide feature and is only detected if all
the CPUs in the sysetm needs the defense, unless it is forced via kernel
command line. This leaves a system with a mix of CPUs with and without
the defense vulnerable. Also, if a late CPU needs KPTI but KPTI was not
activated at boot time, the CPU is currently allowed to boot, which is a
potential security vulnerability.
This patch ensures that the KPTI is turned on if at least one CPU detects
the capability (i.e, change scope to SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU). Also rejetcs a late
CPU, if it requires the defense, when the system hasn't enabled it,
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 49c4ae331ca7..383c69c95f23 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -239,6 +239,15 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU | \
ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU)
+/*
+ * CPU feature detected at boot time, on one or more CPUs. A late CPU
+ * is not allowed to have the capability when the system doesn't have it.
+ * It is Ok for a late CPU to miss the feature.
+ */
+#define ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_RESTRICTED_CPU_LOCAL_FEATURE \
+ (ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU | \
+ ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU)
+
struct arm64_cpu_capabilities {
const char *desc;
u16 capability;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 373173bc3ab3..a15be4db6bf4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -862,10 +862,9 @@ static bool has_no_fpsimd(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unus
static int __kpti_forced; /* 0: not forced, >0: forced on, <0: forced off */
static bool unmap_kernel_at_el0(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
- int __unused)
+ int scope)
{
char const *str = "command line option";
- u64 pfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
/*
* For reasons that aren't entirely clear, enabling KPTI on Cavium
@@ -896,8 +895,7 @@ static bool unmap_kernel_at_el0(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
}
/* Defer to CPU feature registers */
- return !cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(pfr0,
- ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT);
+ return !has_cpuid_feature(entry, scope);
}
static void
@@ -1044,7 +1042,15 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
{
.desc = "Kernel page table isolation (KPTI)",
.capability = ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0,
- .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+ .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_RESTRICTED_CPU_LOCAL_FEATURE,
+ /*
+ * The ID feature fields below are used to indicate that
+ * the CPU doesn't need KPTI. See unmap_kernel_at_el0 for
+ * more details.
+ */
+ .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .field_pos = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT,
+ .min_field_value = 1,
.matches = unmap_kernel_at_el0,
.cpu_enable = kpti_install_ng_mappings,
},
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists