[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1ab0e86-e7ed-6950-2b84-e6ebaa6d6db8@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 15:30:02 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mroos@...ux.ee, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
thomas.lendacky@....com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/pti: Make sure the user/kernel PTEs match
On 01/03/2018 08:22 AM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,8 @@ static void __init pti_setup_espfix64(void)
> static void __init pti_clone_entry_text(void)
> {
> pti_clone_pmds((unsigned long) __entry_text_start,
> - (unsigned long) __irqentry_text_end, _PAGE_RW);
> + (unsigned long) __irqentry_text_end,
> + _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_GLOBAL);
> }
We appear to have lost all of our global bits between this and the
cpu_entry_area itself. To make K8 happy, shouldn't we just *set*
_PAGE_GLOBAL universally instead of clearing it universally?
Also, don't we want _PAGE_GLOBAL in the cpu_entry_area.c pte setting? I
think I had this for all the shared user/kernel areas near the end of
the KAISER era, but we appear to have totally nuked it for PTI.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists