linux-kernel - Re: Software evolution around “checkpatch.pl”?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180210145336.233c721d@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 10 Feb 2018 14:53:36 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software evolution around “checkpatch.pl”?

On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:45:48 +0100
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> > Check patch is dumb and often gives false positives.  
> 
> Would you like to improve this software situation anyhow?

While it would be great to improve checkpatches false
positive rate, it's very nature as a string matcher makes
this hard.

Jonathan

> 
> Regards,
> Markus