[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1518322806.126111496@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:20:06 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@...kov.net>,
"Tuomas Tynkkynen" <tuomas@...era.com>,
"Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 12/79] fs/9p: Compare qid.path in v9fs_test_inode
3.2.99-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas@...era.com>
commit 8ee031631546cf2f7859cc69593bd60bbdd70b46 upstream.
Commit fd2421f54423 ("fs/9p: When doing inode lookup compare qid details
and inode mode bits.") transformed v9fs_qid_iget() to use iget5_locked()
instead of iget_locked(). However, the test() callback is not checking
fid.path at all, which means that a lookup in the inode cache can now
accidentally locate a completely wrong inode from the same inode hash
bucket if the other fields (qid.type and qid.version) match.
Fixes: fd2421f54423 ("fs/9p: When doing inode lookup compare qid details and inode mode bits.")
Reviewed-by: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas@...era.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 3 +++
fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -469,6 +469,9 @@ static int v9fs_test_inode(struct inode
if (v9inode->qid.type != st->qid.type)
return 0;
+
+ if (v9inode->qid.path != st->qid.path)
+ return 0;
return 1;
}
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
@@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ static int v9fs_test_inode_dotl(struct i
if (v9inode->qid.type != st->qid.type)
return 0;
+
+ if (v9inode->qid.path != st->qid.path)
+ return 0;
return 1;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists