[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CxQ29LpqPbzxUjJhM1-Yir0bMTnp=y_Ds2_+63zOSz0qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 16:56:50 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Fix SMRAM accessing even if VM is shutdown
2018-02-11 11:20 GMT+08:00 Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...il.com>:
>
>
> On 02/09/2018 08:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 09/02/2018 04:22, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is a good question... :)
>>>
>>> This case (with KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID is set) can be easily constructed,
>>> userspace should avoid this case by itself (avoiding vCPU accessing the
>>> memslot which is being updated). If it happens, it's a operation issue
>>> rather than INTERNAL ERROR.
>>>
>>> Maybe treat it as MMIO accessing and return to userspace with MMIO_EXIT
>>> is a better solution...
>>
>>
>> Yeah, that's what emulation would do (except if it's an instruction
>> fetch, which will cause emulation to fail). I think it's a bug in the
>> non-EPT #PF case that we return with -EFAULT.
>
>
> Wanpeng, could you please do it? :)
Thanks for the discussion, I will have a try. :)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists