[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518372105.2617.22.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:01:45 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: alex chen <alex.chen@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>,
Jun Piao <piaojun@...wei.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>,
Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>,
Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 39/79] ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in
ocfs2_setattr()
On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 15:39 +0800, alex chen wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() was introduced in 4.6 and the problem this patch
> fixes is only exist in the kernel 4.6 and above 4.6.
Thanks for the reminder. I'll drop this from the 3.2 and 3.16 patch
queues.
Ben.
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On 2018/2/11 12:20, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.2.99-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: alex chen <alex.chen@...wei.com>
> >
> > commit 28f5a8a7c033cbf3e32277f4cc9c6afd74f05300 upstream.
> >
> > we should wait dio requests to finish before inode lock in
> > ocfs2_setattr(), otherwise the following deadlock will happen:
> >
> > process 1 process 2 process 3
> > truncate file 'A' end_io of writing file 'A' receiving the bast messages
> > ocfs2_setattr
> > ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker
> > ocfs2_inode_lock_full
> > inode_dio_wait
> > __inode_dio_wait
> > -->waiting for all dio
> > requests finish
> > dlm_proxy_ast_handler
> > dlm_do_local_bast
> > ocfs2_blocking_ast
> > ocfs2_generic_handle_bast
> > set OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED flag
> > dio_end_io
> > dio_bio_end_aio
> > dio_complete
> > ocfs2_dio_end_io
> > ocfs2_dio_end_io_write
> > ocfs2_inode_lock
> > __ocfs2_cluster_lock
> > ocfs2_wait_for_mask
> > -->waiting for OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED
> > flag to be cleared, that is waiting
> > for 'process 1' unlocking the inode lock
> > inode_dio_end
> > -->here dec the i_dio_count, but will never
> > be called, so a deadlock happened.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/59F81636.70508@huawei.com
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@...wei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@...wei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>
> > Acked-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>
> > Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>
> > Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
> > Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> > ---
> > fs/ocfs2/file.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> > @@ -1130,6 +1130,13 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
> > dquot_initialize(inode);
> > size_change = S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE;
> > if (size_change) {
> > + /*
> > + * Here we should wait dio to finish before inode lock
> > + * to avoid a deadlock between ocfs2_setattr() and
> > + * ocfs2_dio_end_io_write()
> > + */
> > + inode_dio_wait(inode);
> > +
> > status = ocfs2_rw_lock(inode, 1);
> > if (status < 0) {
> > mlog_errno(status);
> > @@ -1149,8 +1156,6 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
> > if (status)
> > goto bail_unlock;
> >
> > - inode_dio_wait(inode);
> > -
> > if (i_size_read(inode) >= attr->ia_size) {
> > if (ocfs2_should_order_data(inode)) {
> > status = ocfs2_begin_ordered_truncate(inode,
> >
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
--
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists