[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F7FB13AC-EB26-48DE-BDB4-909D19DEAE7C@amacapital.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:30:15 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Mark D Rustad <mrustad@...il.com>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31 v2] PTI support for x86_32
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 2:12 PM, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 11:42 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 11, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Mark D Rustad <mrustad@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 2018, at 2:59 AM, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does Debian make it easy to upgrade to a 64-bit kernel if you
>>>>> have a
>>>>> 32-bit install?
>>>>
>>>> Quite easy, yeah. Crossgrading userspace is not for the faint of
>>>> the heart,
>>>> but changing just the kernel is fine.
>>>
>>> ISTR that iscsi doesn't work when running a 64-bit kernel with a
>>> 32-bit userspace. I remember someone offered kernel patches to fix
>>> it, but I think they were rejected. I haven't messed with that
>>> stuff in many years, so perhaps the userspace side now has
>>> accommodation for it. It might be something to check on.
>>>
>>
>> At the risk of suggesting heresy, should we consider removing x86_32
>> support at some point?
>
> Hey, my cloud server is 32 bit:
>
> bedivere:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 15
> model : 2
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
> stepping : 9
> microcode : 0x2e
> cpu MHz : 2813.464
> [...]
>
> I suspect a lot of people are in the same position: grandfathered in on
> an old hosting plan, but not really willing to switch to a new 64 bit
> box because the monthly cost about doubles and nothing it does is
> currently anywhere up to (let alone over) the capacity of the single
> 686 processor.
>
> The thing which is making me consider it is actually getting a TPM to
> protect the private keys, but doubling the monthly cost is still a huge
> disincentive.
Where are they hosting this? Last I checked, replacing a P4 and motherboard with something new paid for itself in about a year in power savings.
>
> James
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists