[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180211155047.7859be96@xeon-e3>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 15:50:47 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Michael Kelley <mhkelley@...look.com>
Cc: "mikelley@...rosoft.com" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"leann.ogasawara@...onical.com" <leann.ogasawara@...onical.com>,
"marcelo.cerri@...onical.com" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
"sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH char-misc 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix ring buffer
signaling
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:48:49 +0000
Michael Kelley <mhkelley@...look.com> wrote:
> + u32 delta = rbi->ring_buffer->read_index < rbi->priv_read_index ?
> + (rbi->priv_read_index - rbi->ring_buffer->read_index) :
> + (rbi->ring_datasize - rbi->ring_buffer->read_index +
> + rbi->priv_read_index);
>
Would it would make sense for this to be a wrapper function like other ring operations?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists