linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 075/136] blktrace: Fix potential deadlock between delete & sysfs ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1518323471.542842782@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:31:11 +0000
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Waiman Long" <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 075/136] blktrace: Fix potential deadlock between
 delete & sysfs ops

3.16.54-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>

commit 5acb3cc2c2e9d3020a4fee43763c6463767f1572 upstream.

The lockdep code had reported the following unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(s_active#228);
                               lock(&bdev->bd_mutex/1);
                               lock(s_active#228);
  lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

The deadlock may happen when one task (CPU1) is trying to delete a
partition in a block device and another task (CPU0) is accessing
tracing sysfs file (e.g. /sys/block/dm-1/trace/act_mask) in that
partition.

The s_active isn't an actual lock. It is a reference count (kn->count)
on the sysfs (kernfs) file. Removal of a sysfs file, however, require
a wait until all the references are gone. The reference count is
treated like a rwsem using lockdep instrumentation code.

The fact that a thread is in the sysfs callback method or in the
ioctl call means there is a reference to the opended sysfs or device
file. That should prevent the underlying block structure from being
removed.

Instead of using bd_mutex in the block_device structure, a new
blk_trace_mutex is now added to the request_queue structure to protect
access to the blk_trace structure.

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

Fix typo in patch subject line, and prune a comment detailing how
the code used to work.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 block/blk-core.c        |  3 +++
 include/linux/blkdev.h  |  1 +
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_no
 
 	kobject_init(&q->kobj, &blk_queue_ktype);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE
+	mutex_init(&q->blk_trace_mutex);
+#endif
 	mutex_init(&q->sysfs_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&q->__queue_lock);
 
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ struct request_queue {
 	int			node;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE
 	struct blk_trace	*blk_trace;
+	struct mutex		blk_trace_mutex;
 #endif
 	/*
 	 * for flush operations
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -634,6 +634,12 @@ int blk_trace_startstop(struct request_q
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_trace_startstop);
 
+/*
+ * When reading or writing the blktrace sysfs files, the references to the
+ * opened sysfs or device files should prevent the underlying block device
+ * from being removed. So no further delete protection is really needed.
+ */
+
 /**
  * blk_trace_ioctl: - handle the ioctls associated with tracing
  * @bdev:	the block device
@@ -651,7 +657,7 @@ int blk_trace_ioctl(struct block_device
 	if (!q)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&q->blk_trace_mutex);
 
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case BLKTRACESETUP:
@@ -677,7 +683,7 @@ int blk_trace_ioctl(struct block_device
 		break;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&q->blk_trace_mutex);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1670,7 +1676,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_show
 	if (q == NULL)
 		goto out_bdput;
 
-	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&q->blk_trace_mutex);
 
 	if (attr == &dev_attr_enable) {
 		ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", !!q->blk_trace);
@@ -1689,7 +1695,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_show
 		ret = sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", q->blk_trace->end_lba);
 
 out_unlock_bdev:
-	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&q->blk_trace_mutex);
 out_bdput:
 	bdput(bdev);
 out:
@@ -1731,7 +1737,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_stor
 	if (q == NULL)
 		goto out_bdput;
 
-	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&q->blk_trace_mutex);
 
 	if (attr == &dev_attr_enable) {
 		if (value)
@@ -1757,7 +1763,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_stor
 	}
 
 out_unlock_bdev:
-	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&q->blk_trace_mutex);
 out_bdput:
 	bdput(bdev);
 out: