[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49inb1n7kb.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:53:40 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, ross.zwisler@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm: re-enable deep flush for pmem devices
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com> writes:
> Re-enable deep flush so that users always have a way to be sure that a write
> does make it all the way out to the NVDIMM. The PMEM driver writes always
> make it "all the way to the NVDIMM", and it relies on the ADR mechanism to
> flush the write buffers on power failure. Deep flush is there to explicitly
> flush those write buffers to protect against (rare) ADR failure.
> This change prevents a regression in deep flush behavior so that applications
> can continue to depend on fsync() as a mechanism to trigger deep flush in the
> filesystem-dax case.
That's still very confusing text. Specifically, the part where you say
that pmem driver writes always make it to the DIMM. I think the
changelog could start with "Deep flush is there to explicitly flush
write buffers...." Anyway, the fix looks right to me.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists