linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/19] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of using l_wait

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <151847927897.19840.8283814090245785502.stgit@noble>
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:47:59 +1100
From:   NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To:     Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lustre <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/19] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of
 using l_wait_event()

Two places that LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL() is used, the outcome is a
simple polling loop that polls every second for some event (with a
limit).

So write a simple loop to make this more apparent.

Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c |   11 +++++------
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c |   12 +++++-------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
index ccb614bd7f53..9e96a8ee1783 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
@@ -1984,8 +1984,7 @@ void ll_umount_begin(struct super_block *sb)
 	struct ll_sb_info *sbi = ll_s2sbi(sb);
 	struct obd_device *obd;
 	struct obd_ioctl_data *ioc_data;
-	wait_queue_head_t waitq;
-	struct l_wait_info lwi;
+	int cnt = 0;
 
 	CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, "VFS Op: superblock %p count %d active %d\n", sb,
 	       sb->s_count, atomic_read(&sb->s_active));
@@ -2021,10 +2020,10 @@ void ll_umount_begin(struct super_block *sb)
 	 * and then continue. For now, we just periodically checking for vfs
 	 * to decrement mnt_cnt and hope to finish it within 10sec.
 	 */
-	init_waitqueue_head(&waitq);
-	lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(10 * HZ,
-				   HZ, NULL, NULL);
-	l_wait_event(waitq, may_umount(sbi->ll_mnt.mnt), &lwi);
+	while (cnt < 10 && !may_umount(sbi->ll_mnt.mnt)) {
+		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ);
+		cnt ++;
+	}
 
 	schedule();
 }
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
index fb3b7a7fa32a..c1e58fcc30b3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
@@ -99,8 +99,7 @@ static int lov_check_set(struct lov_obd *lov, int idx)
  */
 static int lov_check_and_wait_active(struct lov_obd *lov, int ost_idx)
 {
-	wait_queue_head_t waitq;
-	struct l_wait_info lwi;
+	int cnt = 0;
 	struct lov_tgt_desc *tgt;
 	int rc = 0;
 
@@ -125,11 +124,10 @@ static int lov_check_and_wait_active(struct lov_obd *lov, int ost_idx)
 
 	mutex_unlock(&lov->lov_lock);
 
-	init_waitqueue_head(&waitq);
-	lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(obd_timeout * HZ,
-				   HZ, NULL, NULL);
-
-	rc = l_wait_event(waitq, lov_check_set(lov, ost_idx), &lwi);
+	while (cnt < obd_timeout && !lov_check_set(lov, ost_idx)) {
+		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ);
+		cnt ++;
+	}
 	if (tgt->ltd_active)
 		return 1;