[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518431893.2744.1.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:38:13 +0100
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep
Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
> On 26 January 2018 at 09:38, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach()
> > and
> > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here,
> > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic
> > context,
> > namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
> > Thus mdelay can be replaced with msleep to avoid busy wait.
> >
> > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by
> > myself.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > index 0c80bea..f84ac72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ static void genpd_dev_pm_detach(struct device
> > *dev, bool power_off)
> > if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> > break;
> >
> > - mdelay(i);
> > + msleep(i);
>
> This looks like a nice improvement, however moving to msleep() makes
> the call to cond_resched() below a bit superfluous. Perhaps remove
> that as well.
At least for small values of i, msleep also has a high chance to
overshoot the desired sleep by a lot. It would be better to convert
them to usleep_range with an acceptable slack.
Regards,
Lucas
> > cond_resched();
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2231,7 +2231,7 @@ int genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev)
> > if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> > break;
> >
> > - mdelay(i);
> > + msleep(i);
>
> Ditto.
>
> > cond_resched();
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists