linux-kernel - [PATCH 13/21] regulator: s2mps11: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180212131717.27193-14-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:17:09 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/21] regulator: s2mps11: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number

Instead of passing a global GPIO number for the enable GPIO, pass
a descriptor looked up with the standard devm_gpiod_get_optional()
call.

This regulator supports passing platform data, but enable/sleep
regulators are looked up from the device tree exclusively, so
we can need not touch other files.

Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
index 7726b874e539..9a1dca26362e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
 #include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/samsung/core.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/samsung/s2mps11.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/samsung/s2mps13.h>
@@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ struct s2mps11_info {
 	 * Array (size: number of regulators) with GPIO-s for external
 	 * sleep control.
 	 */
-	int *ext_control_gpio;
+	struct gpio_desc **ext_control_gpiod;
 };
 
 static int get_ramp_delay(int ramp_delay)
@@ -524,7 +523,7 @@ static int s2mps14_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	case S2MPS14X:
 		if (test_bit(rdev_get_id(rdev), s2mps11->suspend_state))
 			val = S2MPS14_ENABLE_SUSPEND;
-		else if (gpio_is_valid(s2mps11->ext_control_gpio[rdev_get_id(rdev)]))
+		else if (s2mps11->ext_control_gpiod[rdev_get_id(rdev)])
 			val = S2MPS14_ENABLE_EXT_CONTROL;
 		else
 			val = rdev->desc->enable_mask;
@@ -818,7 +817,7 @@ static int s2mps14_pmic_enable_ext_control(struct s2mps11_info *s2mps11,
 static void s2mps14_pmic_dt_parse_ext_control_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		struct of_regulator_match *rdata, struct s2mps11_info *s2mps11)
 {
-	int *gpio = s2mps11->ext_control_gpio;
+	struct gpio_desc **gpio = s2mps11->ext_control_gpiod;
 	unsigned int i;
 	unsigned int valid_regulators[3] = { S2MPS14_LDO10, S2MPS14_LDO11,
 		S2MPS14_LDO12 };
@@ -829,11 +828,20 @@ static void s2mps14_pmic_dt_parse_ext_control_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		if (!rdata[reg].init_data || !rdata[reg].of_node)
 			continue;
 
-		gpio[reg] = of_get_named_gpio(rdata[reg].of_node,
-				"samsung,ext-control-gpios", 0);
-		if (gpio_is_valid(gpio[reg]))
-			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Using GPIO %d for ext-control over %d/%s\n",
-					gpio[reg], reg, rdata[reg].name);
+		gpio[reg] = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev,
+							rdata[reg].of_node,
+							"samsung,ext-control-gpios",
+							0,
+							GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
+							"s2mps11-LDO");
+		if (IS_ERR(gpio[reg])) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get control GPIO for %d/%s\n",
+				reg, rdata[reg].name);
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (gpio[reg])
+			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Using GPIO for ext-control over %d/%s\n",
+				reg, rdata[reg].name);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1139,17 +1147,11 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	s2mps11->ext_control_gpio = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev,
-			sizeof(*s2mps11->ext_control_gpio) * rdev_num,
+	s2mps11->ext_control_gpiod = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev,
+			sizeof(*s2mps11->ext_control_gpiod) * rdev_num,
 			GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!s2mps11->ext_control_gpio)
+	if (!s2mps11->ext_control_gpiod)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	/*
-	 * 0 is a valid GPIO so initialize all GPIO-s to negative value
-	 * to indicate that external control won't be used for this regulator.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < rdev_num; i++)
-		s2mps11->ext_control_gpio[i] = -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!iodev->dev->of_node) {
 		if (iodev->pdata) {
@@ -1179,8 +1181,6 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	config.dev = &pdev->dev;
 	config.regmap = iodev->regmap_pmic;
 	config.driver_data = s2mps11;
-	config.ena_gpio_flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH;
-	config.ena_gpio_initialized = true;
 	for (i = 0; i < rdev_num; i++) {
 		struct regulator_dev *regulator;
 
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			config.init_data = rdata[i].init_data;
 			config.of_node = rdata[i].of_node;
 		}
-		config.ena_gpio = s2mps11->ext_control_gpio[i];
+		config.ena_gpiod = s2mps11->ext_control_gpiod[i];
 
 		regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev,
 						&regulators[i], &config);
@@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		if (gpio_is_valid(s2mps11->ext_control_gpio[i])) {
+		if (s2mps11->ext_control_gpiod[i]) {
 			ret = s2mps14_pmic_enable_ext_control(s2mps11,
 					regulator);
 			if (ret < 0) {
-- 
2.14.3