[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ba82b3c-367e-29d3-59ee-6d85ce10037a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:53:24 -0800
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: longman@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v6] lib: debugobjects: add global free list and the
counter
On 2/12/18 7:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> + * The objs on the pool list might be allocated before the work is
>>> + * run, so recheck if pool list it full or not, if not fill pool
>>> + * list from the global free list
>>> + */
>>> + while (obj_pool_free < debug_objects_pool_size) {
>>> + if (obj_nr_tofree <= 0)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + obj = hlist_entry(obj_to_free.first, typeof(*obj), node);
>>> + hlist_del(&obj->node);
>>> + hlist_add_head(&obj->node, &obj_pool);
>>> + obj_pool_free++;
>>> + obj_nr_tofree--;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * pool list is already full, and there are still objs on the free list,
>>> + * move remaining free objs to a separate list to free the memory later.
>>> + */
>>> + if (obj_nr_tofree > 0) {
>>> + hlist_move_list(&obj_to_free, &tofree);
>>> + obj_nr_tofree = 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> while (obj_pool_free >= debug_objects_pool_size + ODEBUG_FREE_BATCH) {
>>> for (i = 0; i < ODEBUG_FREE_BATCH; i++) {
>>> objs[i] = hlist_entry(obj_pool.first,
>> This whole section is now pointless and can be removed. There is no way
>> that this code path can be entered after this change. Surplus objects are
>> on the obj_to_free list and not on the obj_pool itself.
Yes, it is correct. I think the whole ODEBUG_FREE_BATCH thing can be
removed too.
Will do it in the next version.
Regards,
Yang
> Actually not in this patch, but in the next one.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists