[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180212200938.sfofuhztrsbvsriy@techsingularity.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:09:38 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Do not migrate due to a sync wakeup on
exit
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:01:27PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:58:57PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 28c8d9c91955..50442697b455 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -5710,8 +5710,14 @@ wake_affine_idle(int this_cpu, int prev_cpu, int sync)
> > if (idle_cpu(this_cpu) && cpus_share_cache(this_cpu, prev_cpu))
> > return idle_cpu(prev_cpu) ? prev_cpu : this_cpu;
> >
> > - if (sync && cpu_rq(this_cpu)->nr_running == 1)
> > + if (sync && cpu_rq(this_cpu)->nr_running == 1) {
> > + /* Avoid tasks exiting pulling parents to new nodes */
>
> Semi-confusing wording (WTH are "pulling parents"? :) - possibly better variant?:
> Avoid having exiting tasks pull their parents to new nodes
That is better wording. If I don't replace the patch with Peter's
version, I'll update it.
> Good catch, it seems.
>
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists