[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802130805550.2264@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 08:07:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
cc: sean.wang@...iatek.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] dmaengine: mediatek: fix zalloc-simple.cocci
warnings
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:55:58PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > > > - ring->txd = dma_alloc_coherent(hsdma2dev(hsdma),
> > > > - pc->sz_ring, &ring->tphys,
> > > > - GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > + ring->txd = dma_zalloc_coherent(hsdma2dev(hsdma), pc->sz_ring,
> > > > + &ring->tphys, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > > if (!ring->txd)
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > - memset(ring->txd, 0, pc->sz_ring);
> > >
> > > This should be folded back..
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "folded back".
>
> Since the original patch is also up for review in this series, it doesn't
> help much to add a change and fix on top in a series. The fix should be
> folded back into the original commit. IIRC Fengguang's bot also recommends
> so..
Sure, no problem. Thanks. (I thought you meant folding or unfolding of a
function definition).
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists