[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1518483942-14741-3-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:05:41 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] KVM: X86: Choose qspinlock when dedicated vCPUs available
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Waiman Long mentioned that:
 Generally speaking, unfair lock performs well for VMs with a small
 number of vCPUs. Native qspinlock may perform better than pvqspinlock
 if there is vCPU pinning and there is no vCPU over-commitment.
This patch uses a KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED performance hint to allow
hypervisor admin to choose the qspinlock to be used when a dedicated
vCPU is available.
PV_DEDICATED = 1, PV_UNHALT = anything: default is qspinlock
PV_DEDICATED = 0, PV_UNHALT = 1: default is Hybrid PV queued/unfair lock
PV_DEDICATED = 0, PV_UNHALT = 0: default is tas
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 77a0723..c5566d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -733,6 +733,11 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
 	if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT))
 		return;
 
+	if (kvm_hint_has_feature(KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED)) {
+		static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	__pv_init_lock_hash();
 	pv_lock_ops.queued_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath;
 	pv_lock_ops.queued_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock);
-- 
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
