lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1518514679-27782-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:37:59 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Fix resume from suspend to idle

When resuming from idle with the new suspend mode configuration support
we go through the resume callbacks with a state of PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE
which we don't have regulator constraints for, causing an error:

    dpm_run_callback(): regulator_resume_early+0x0/0x64 returns -22
    PM: Device regulator.0 failed to resume early: error -22

Avoid this and similar errors by treating missing constraints as a noop.

See also commit 57a0dd187956ea04 ("regulator: Fix suspend to idle"),
which fixed the suspend part.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
---
[hiding in brown paper bag]
No idea how I managed not to see this when testing 57a0dd187956ea04.

 drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index dd4708c58480d277..1fc0c0811da4e9f2 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -4310,7 +4310,7 @@ static int _regulator_resume_early(struct device *dev, void *data)
 
 	rstate = regulator_get_suspend_state(rdev, *state);
 	if (rstate == NULL)
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
 
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ