linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/21] regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180213111147.kr4kecqbhmcoq6w2@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:11:47 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO
 number

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:17:12PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Instead of passing a global GPIO number for the enable GPIO, pass
> a descriptor looked up from the device tree node or the board file
> decriptor table for the regulator.
> 
> There is a single board file passing the GPIOs for LDO1 and LDO2
> through platform data, so augment this to pass descriptors
> associated with the i2c device as well.
> 
> Cc: patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
> Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> Lee: this patch is touching the MFD core driver for WM8994,
> but as with all other patches we just change the regulator
> parts. Would be nice if you could ACK it.
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c                    |  9 ---------
>  drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c         | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  include/linux/mfd/wm8994/pdata.h             |  3 ---
>  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> +static struct gpiod_lookup_table wm8994_gpiod_table = {
> +	.dev_id = "i2c-wm8958", /* I2C device name */
> +	.table = {
> +		GPIO_LOOKUP("GPION", 6,
> +			    "wlf,ldo1ena", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
> +		GPIO_LOOKUP("GPION", 4,
> +			    "wlf,ldo2ena", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
> +		{ },
>  	},
>  };
>  
> @@ -366,6 +379,7 @@ static int wlf_gf_module_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>  					    rev == gf_mods[i].rev))
>  			break;
>  
> +	gpiod_add_lookup_table(&wm8994_gpiod_table);

Would it be nicer to add this as a new member of gf_mods and
register it inside the loop? Since eventually we will need tables
for wm5102, wm8994, wm2200, wm8996, wm5100 and wm0010.

Thanks,
Charles