linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add cdn-dp node for rk3399.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:36:47 +0100
From:   Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add cdn-dp node for rk3399.

2018-02-13 11:42 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo@...labora.com>:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 10/02/18 17:16, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> Hi Enric,
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2018, 17:31:49 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
>>> From: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
>>>
>>> Add a node for the cdn DP controller which is embedded in the rk3399
>>> SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> It looks like there is no binding document at all for cdn-dp? At least
>> I couldn't find one and the original series also didn't seem to include one.
>>
>> And while I don't see anything problematic right with the used properties
>> right now, I'd think we should really have a binding and give dt-maintainers
>> a chance to complain, before adding devicetree nodes based on it.
>>
>> I'd guess a mostly usable binding doc should already sit in the chromeos
>> tree, which you could base a v2 of this series on?
>>
>>
>
> Sure, I'll send a v2 for this series. Thanks.
>
>   Enric
>

So seems that the binding was already discussed and accepted here [1]
but for some reason never landed. So I think that I'll send v2 just
including the binding patch so all can land together. Sounds good?

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9278077/

Cheers,
 Enric


>> Thanks
>> Heiko
>>