linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/pti] Revert "x86/speculation: Simplify indirect_branch_prediction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:38:07 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        dwmw@...zon.co.uk, luto@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        Joe Konno <joe.konno@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] Revert "x86/speculation: Simplify
 indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()"


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:28:38PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Separate would be better, it makes sense and is one problem less to worry about?
> 
> Something like so then?

Yeah, perfect!

> I'm not entirely sure which commit wants to fo in Fixes, I picked the earlier 
> one, but it could equally have been:
> 
> Fixes: f208820a321f ("Revert "x86/speculation: Simplify indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()"")

I'll leave the tag out (in case a rebase has to be done), as these commits are 
close enough to each other and are also in a single backporting block of commits.

Thanks,

	Ingo