linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/92] 4.9.81-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c1ed8b1-bd9c-4b9f-051b-f9f19591cdbb@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:30:36 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/92] 4.9.81-stable review

On 02/13/2018 01:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 07:46:50AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 02/09/2018 05:38 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.81 release.
>>> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun Feb 11 13:39:04 UTC 2018.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 145 pass: 140 fail: 5
>> Failed builds:
>> 	powerpc:defconfig
>> 	powerpc:allmodconfig
>> 	powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig
>> 	powerpc:cell_defconfig
>> 	powerpc:maple_defconfig
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 118 pass: 113 fail: 5
>> Failed tests:
>> 	powerpc:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:nosmp
>> 	powerpc:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp4
>> 	powerpc:pseries:pseries_defconfig
>> 	powerpc:mpc8544ds:ppc64_e5500_defconfig:nosmp
>> 	powerpc:mpc8544ds:ppc64_e5500_defconfig:smp
>>
>> All builds and tests fail with the following error.
>>
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c:41:25: fatal error: asm/debugfs.h: No such file or directory
>>
>> For older kernels, the backport of 236003e6b5443c4 ("powerpc/64s: Allow control of RFI
>> flush via debugfs") should include linux/debugfs.h, not asm/debugfs.h.
> 
> Thanks for letting me know, I've now fixed this up.  Will go work on the
> 4.4 patch as well.
> 

Unfortunately it wasn't the only problem. Now we have:

arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:260: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to_user'
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:270: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to_kernel'
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:885: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to_user'
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:900: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to_kernel'

Looks like 222f20f140623 ("powerpc/64s: Simple RFI macro conversions") is missing,
or at least part of it. Unfortunately it doesn't apply cleanly.

4.4 also now has a different failure.

In file included from drivers/staging/rdma/ehca/hcp_if.c:45:0:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h:439:2: error: unknown type name 'u64'
   u64 character;
   ^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h:440:2: error: unknown type name 'u64'
   u64 behaviour;

You'll need 1b689a95ce742 to fix that problem.

Guenter