[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0680083-5cd2-e152-0d64-f5a931274a8e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 07:09:44 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, ak@...ux.intel.com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, karahmed@...zon.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 43/92] x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are
not vulnerable to Meltdown
>
> So, any hints on what you think should be the correct fix here?
the patch sure looks correct to me, it now has a nice table for CPU IDs
including all of AMD (and soon hopefully the existing Intel ones that are not exposed to meltdown)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists