| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7207F5AF-1798-4C53-8EBF-6A8316004D1C@cray.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:15:58 +0000
From: Patrick Farrell <paf@...y.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
"Andreas Dilger" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lustre <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove
l_wait_event() and related code
With the fix from yesterday, these look good. Thanks, Neil.
Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@...y.com>
- Patrick
On 2/12/18, 5:52 PM, "lustre-devel on behalf of NeilBrown" <lustre-devel-bounces@...ts.lustre.org on behalf of neilb@...e.com> wrote:
These macros are no longer used, so they can
be removed.
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h | 249 --------------------
1 file changed, 249 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
index ccc1a329e42b..1efd86f18c1f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
@@ -76,123 +76,6 @@ int do_set_info_async(struct obd_import *imp,
void target_send_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *req, int rc, int fail_id);
-/*
- * l_wait_event is a flexible sleeping function, permitting simple caller
- * configuration of interrupt and timeout sensitivity along with actions to
- * be performed in the event of either exception.
- *
- * The first form of usage looks like this:
- *
- * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(timeout, timeout_handler,
- * intr_handler, callback_data);
- * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
- *
- * l_wait_event() makes the current process wait on 'waitq' until 'condition'
- * is TRUE or a "killable" signal (SIGTERM, SIKGILL, SIGINT) is pending. It
- * returns 0 to signify 'condition' is TRUE, but if a signal wakes it before
- * 'condition' becomes true, it optionally calls the specified 'intr_handler'
- * if not NULL, and returns -EINTR.
- *
- * If a non-zero timeout is specified, signals are ignored until the timeout
- * has expired. At this time, if 'timeout_handler' is not NULL it is called.
- * If it returns FALSE l_wait_event() continues to wait as described above with
- * signals enabled. Otherwise it returns -ETIMEDOUT.
- *
- * LWI_INTR(intr_handler, callback_data) is shorthand for
- * LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(0, NULL, intr_handler, callback_data)
- *
- * The second form of usage looks like this:
- *
- * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT(timeout, timeout_handler);
- * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
- *
- * This form is the same as the first except that it COMPLETELY IGNORES
- * SIGNALS. The caller must therefore beware that if 'timeout' is zero, or if
- * 'timeout_handler' is not NULL and returns FALSE, then the ONLY thing that
- * can unblock the current process is 'condition' becoming TRUE.
- *
- * Another form of usage is:
- * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(timeout, interval,
- * timeout_handler);
- * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
- * This is the same as previous case, but condition is checked once every
- * 'interval' jiffies (if non-zero).
- *
- * Subtle synchronization point: this macro does *not* necessary takes
- * wait-queue spin-lock before returning, and, hence, following idiom is safe
- * ONLY when caller provides some external locking:
- *
- * Thread1 Thread2
- *
- * l_wait_event(&obj->wq, ....); (1)
- *
- * wake_up(&obj->wq): (2)
- * spin_lock(&q->lock); (2.1)
- * __wake_up_common(q, ...); (2.2)
- * spin_unlock(&q->lock, flags); (2.3)
- *
- * kfree(obj); (3)
- *
- * As l_wait_event() may "short-cut" execution and return without taking
- * wait-queue spin-lock, some additional synchronization is necessary to
- * guarantee that step (3) can begin only after (2.3) finishes.
- *
- * XXX nikita: some ptlrpc daemon threads have races of that sort.
- *
- */
-
-#define LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP ((void (*)(void *))(-1))
-
-struct l_wait_info {
- long lwi_timeout;
- long lwi_interval;
- int lwi_allow_intr;
- int (*lwi_on_timeout)(void *);
- void (*lwi_on_signal)(void *);
- void *lwi_cb_data;
-};
-
-/* NB: LWI_TIMEOUT ignores signals completely */
-#define LWI_TIMEOUT(time, cb, data) \
-((struct l_wait_info) { \
- .lwi_timeout = time, \
- .lwi_on_timeout = cb, \
- .lwi_cb_data = data, \
- .lwi_interval = 0, \
- .lwi_allow_intr = 0 \
-})
-
-#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(time, interval, cb, data) \
-((struct l_wait_info) { \
- .lwi_timeout = time, \
- .lwi_on_timeout = cb, \
- .lwi_cb_data = data, \
- .lwi_interval = interval, \
- .lwi_allow_intr = 0 \
-})
-
-#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(time, time_cb, sig_cb, data) \
-((struct l_wait_info) { \
- .lwi_timeout = time, \
- .lwi_on_timeout = time_cb, \
- .lwi_on_signal = sig_cb, \
- .lwi_cb_data = data, \
- .lwi_interval = 0, \
- .lwi_allow_intr = 0 \
-})
-
-#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR_ALL(time, time_cb, sig_cb, data) \
-((struct l_wait_info) { \
- .lwi_timeout = time, \
- .lwi_on_timeout = time_cb, \
- .lwi_on_signal = sig_cb, \
- .lwi_cb_data = data, \
- .lwi_interval = 0, \
- .lwi_allow_intr = 1 \
-})
-
-#define LWI_INTR(cb, data) LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(0, NULL, cb, data)
-
#define LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS (sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGINT) | \
sigmask(SIGTERM) | sigmask(SIGQUIT) | \
sigmask(SIGALRM))
@@ -201,138 +84,6 @@ static inline int l_fatal_signal_pending(struct task_struct *p)
return signal_pending(p) && sigtestsetmask(&p->pending.signal, LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);
}
-/**
- * wait_queue_entry_t of Linux (version < 2.6.34) is a FIFO list for exclusively
- * waiting threads, which is not always desirable because all threads will
- * be waken up again and again, even user only needs a few of them to be
- * active most time. This is not good for performance because cache can
- * be polluted by different threads.
- *
- * LIFO list can resolve this problem because we always wakeup the most
- * recent active thread by default.
- *
- * NB: please don't call non-exclusive & exclusive wait on the same
- * waitq if add_wait_queue_exclusive_head is used.
- */
-#define add_wait_queue_exclusive_head(waitq, link) \
-{ \
- unsigned long flags; \
- \
- spin_lock_irqsave(&((waitq)->lock), flags); \
- __add_wait_queue_exclusive(waitq, link); \
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&((waitq)->lock), flags); \
-}
-
-/*
- * wait for @condition to become true, but no longer than timeout, specified
- * by @info.
- */
-#define __l_wait_event(wq, condition, info, ret, l_add_wait) \
-do { \
- wait_queue_entry_t __wait; \
- long __timeout = info->lwi_timeout; \
- sigset_t __blocked; \
- int __allow_intr = info->lwi_allow_intr; \
- \
- ret = 0; \
- if (condition) \
- break; \
- \
- init_waitqueue_entry(&__wait, current); \
- l_add_wait(&wq, &__wait); \
- \
- /* Block all signals (just the non-fatal ones if no timeout). */ \
- if (info->lwi_on_signal && (__timeout == 0 || __allow_intr)) \
- __blocked = cfs_block_sigsinv(LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS); \
- else \
- __blocked = cfs_block_sigsinv(0); \
- \
- for (;;) { \
- if (condition) \
- break; \
- \
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \
- \
- if (__timeout == 0) { \
- schedule(); \
- } else { \
- long interval = info->lwi_interval ? \
- min_t(long, \
- info->lwi_interval, __timeout) : \
- __timeout; \
- long remaining = schedule_timeout(interval);\
- __timeout = cfs_time_sub(__timeout, \
- cfs_time_sub(interval, remaining));\
- if (__timeout == 0) { \
- if (!info->lwi_on_timeout || \
- info->lwi_on_timeout(info->lwi_cb_data)) { \
- ret = -ETIMEDOUT; \
- break; \
- } \
- /* Take signals after the timeout expires. */ \
- if (info->lwi_on_signal) \
- (void)cfs_block_sigsinv(LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);\
- } \
- } \
- \
- set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); \
- \
- if (condition) \
- break; \
- if (signal_pending(current)) { \
- if (info->lwi_on_signal && \
- (__timeout == 0 || __allow_intr)) { \
- if (info->lwi_on_signal != LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP) \
- info->lwi_on_signal(info->lwi_cb_data);\
- ret = -EINTR; \
- break; \
- } \
- /* We have to do this here because some signals */ \
- /* are not blockable - ie from strace(1). */ \
- /* In these cases we want to schedule_timeout() */ \
- /* again, because we don't want that to return */ \
- /* -EINTR when the RPC actually succeeded. */ \
- /* the recalc_sigpending() below will deliver the */ \
- /* signal properly. */ \
- cfs_clear_sigpending(); \
- } \
- } \
- \
- cfs_restore_sigs(__blocked); \
- \
- remove_wait_queue(&wq, &__wait); \
-} while (0)
-
-#define l_wait_event(wq, condition, info) \
-({ \
- int __ret; \
- struct l_wait_info *__info = (info); \
- \
- __l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info, \
- __ret, add_wait_queue); \
- __ret; \
-})
-
-#define l_wait_event_exclusive(wq, condition, info) \
-({ \
- int __ret; \
- struct l_wait_info *__info = (info); \
- \
- __l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info, \
- __ret, add_wait_queue_exclusive); \
- __ret; \
-})
-
-#define l_wait_event_exclusive_head(wq, condition, info) \
-({ \
- int __ret; \
- struct l_wait_info *__info = (info); \
- \
- __l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info, \
- __ret, add_wait_queue_exclusive_head); \
- __ret; \
-})
-
/** @} lib */
_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists